Discussion question in research interviews.

The two envelopes

Standard

The question

Two envelopes contain money, one twice the other. You open one and find 100. Swapping appears to have expected value 125. What is wrong?

Have a go before you open the solution. If you are stuck after a few minutes, the first paragraph below is usually enough of a nudge.

Show the worked solution

The answer

The calculation assumes the other envelope is equally likely to hold 50 or 200 whatever you observe, which no proper prior over amounts allows.

The naive step writes expected value as half of 50 plus half of 200. That requires the conditional distribution given you saw 100 to be an even split.

For that to hold at every possible observation you would need a prior on the smaller amount that is uniform over all scales, which is not a probability distribution.

With any genuine prior, seeing a large amount makes it more likely you already hold the bigger envelope, and the apparent free gain disappears.

Interviewers care less about naming the paradox than about seeing you ask 'what prior makes this calculation legal'.

What it is testing

Whether you notice an unstated and impossible prior.

Try these next

Preparing properly

Live opportunities

Interviewing soon? See who is hiring

Open vacancies we track at quant firms, grouped by role and city. Adverts are anonymised.

Hiring for these roles? Brief the desk on a hire or check your fit for a role.

Research desk

Speak to a quant market specialist

Ask what a firm really pays, how a desk hires, or where your profile sits. One reply from the research desk, in confidence, no obligation.