Research interview, close to the centre of the job.

The backtest that will not survive

Standard

The question

You tried two hundred signal variants and kept the best. Its backtest Sharpe is 2.5. What do you actually believe?

Have a go before you open the solution. If you are stuck after a few minutes, the first paragraph below is usually enough of a nudge.

Show the worked solution

The answer

Very little, until you adjust for the number of trials. The maximum of many noisy estimates is biased high.

With 200 independent trials on pure noise, the best in-sample Sharpe is expected to be around sqrt(2 ln 200), roughly 3.2 standard errors above zero.

So a best-of-200 Sharpe of 2.5 is entirely consistent with having no edge at all.

The corrections are to report the deflated Sharpe, hold out data you never looked at, and record the true number of trials, including the ones you ran informally.

The answer interviewers want is the trials count. Candidates who defend the 2.5 without mentioning it fail this question.

What it is testing

Multiple-testing awareness, the most common real failure in research work.

Try these next

Preparing properly

Live opportunities

Interviewing soon? See who is hiring

Open vacancies we track at quant firms, grouped by role and city. Adverts are anonymised.

Hiring for these roles? Brief the desk on a hire or check your fit for a role.

Research desk

Speak to a quant market specialist

Ask what a firm really pays, how a desk hires, or where your profile sits. One reply from the research desk, in confidence, no obligation.