Research interview, often about the candidate's own backtest.

How long to trust a Sharpe ratio

Hard

The question

A strategy shows a Sharpe of 2 over six months. How much should that convince you?

Have a go before you open the solution. If you are stuck after a few minutes, the first paragraph below is usually enough of a nudge.

Show the worked solution

The answer

Not much. The standard error over half a year is roughly 1.4.

The standard error of an estimated Sharpe is approximately sqrt((1 + S^2/2)/T) with T in years.

With S = 2 and T = 0.5, that is sqrt(3/0.5) divided by... more directly, sqrt((1+2)/0.5) is about 2.4, and even the simpler approximation 1/sqrt(T) gives 1.4.

Either way the estimate is not separable from zero at conventional confidence, so a six-month Sharpe of 2 is consistent with a genuinely mediocre strategy that had a good run.

Add selection bias, since you are usually shown the strategy because it looked good, and the honest position is that six months tells you very little.

What it is testing

Quantifying uncertainty in a performance statistic rather than reading it at face value.

Try these next

Preparing properly

Live opportunities

Interviewing soon? See who is hiring

Open vacancies we track at quant firms, grouped by role and city. Adverts are anonymised.

Hiring for these roles? Brief the desk on a hire or check your fit for a role.

Research desk

Speak to a quant market specialist

Ask what a firm really pays, how a desk hires, or where your profile sits. One reply from the research desk, in confidence, no obligation.